• Archives

  • Categories

  • Altahrir Nieuws (Magazine)

Gaza ministry: Egypt, Israel reduced fuel deliveries

Gaza’s ministry of power says fuel deliveries have been reduced by Egypt  and Israel.
GAZA CITY (Ma’an) — Gaza’s Ministry of Energy said on Tuesday that deliveries of fuel from Qatar had been reduced by Egypt and Israel, the countries through which it is transited.

The ministry said in a statement that it is receiving approximately 100,000 liters of fuel per day, while the power station in the Gaza Strip needs 500,000 liters each day.

This reduction comes as electricity needs increase during the summer months, the ministry said.

It blamed “Israeli intransigence and the clear failure of the Egyptian Ministry of Petroleum,” without elaborating.

The sole power plant in Gaza shut down in June because it had run out of fuel after the Qatari shipment was delayed.

Israeli authorities later opened a second crossing into Gaza as a special measure to allow the fuel passage.

Gaza has been plagued with intermittent blackouts since February when Egypt stopped allowing Hamas authorities to receive fuel via a tunnel network under Gaza’s southern border.

Hamas has argued that it has a right to import fuel directly, but Egypt was angered that it was securing cheap, illicit fuel, rather than purchasing supplies at cost like other countries.

(www.maannews.net / 03.07.2012)

What Killed Arafat?

Q&A: Suha Arafat
The late Palestinian leader’s widow talks about the investigation and how it might impact Arafat’s legacy.

Arafat said her husband’s death was “not a natural death, it was a crime” [Al Jazeera]
 

Al Jazeera: What was your reaction upon learning the results of the investigation?

My goodness. The results, that they discovered the polonium in his blood, and radioactive polonium in his clothing, on his hat, on the hair, in his underwear, and it’s not the quantity that they found – polonium, it’s all over actually, it’s a substance – but they found a very high quantity of polonium. It means that it’s not a natural death.

Here, I’m seeing a crime. And if I tell you that this laboratory is the best laboratory in the world, in Switzerland, they put their name in this, and their reputation.

And you know how much the Swiss are precise in their work, in their ways. So they put all their efforts, and they are taking the challenge and the risk, even, to tell their name. And the doctors, they revealed themselves – it’s not a hidden thing. Its credibility goes from the origin of this toxicological laboratory, one of the most famous in the world.

From this point, we have this credibility of the analysis. It’s a neutral… this analysis comes from a neutral laboratory, from neutral people, from neutral doctors, internationally recognized. The credibility comes from the chosen laboratory to know the result of what’s going on.

I did not go for further investigation. In the beginning, you might ask why, eight years later… I thought that when Yasser was buried that we did not do any kind of autopsy, so that we had nothing, and they did not discover anything. But when Al Jazeera came to me, and they said that we want to investigate, and do the investigation in this case, I thought that I might have some of his clothing, because they gave me in the hospital all of his clothing that was with him, his pajamas, his underwear, all the things that he was wearing.

So Al Jazeera was so much interested to take this great risk, and… this is a national job, to go and search the best laboratory in the world, and to give it – they took the DNA of my daughter. My daughter is with me in this investigation, she does not want to appear, but she was so much helpful, because she wants to know from what her father died. So she gave her DNA, so they can compare the DNA of my daughter with the DNA of what they found on the clothing and the hair of my husband.

Bio: Suha Arafat

Suha Arafat comes from the al-Tawil family, a wealthy Christian family living in the West bank. Her father, Daoud al-Tawil, was a banker; her mother, Remonda al-Tawil, had political, media and literary interests.

She attended school in the Palestinian Territories, then moved to France and joined the Sorbonne University in Paris.

Arafat first met Suha in 1985 at al-Wuhdat refugee camp in Jordan, when she was in her early 20s. Arafat was 58 then.

They developed a working relationship when Suha became Arafat’s assistant and interpreter during his meetings with French officials and politicians.

In 1989, Arafat married Suha, but the relationship remained a secret. It was known only to a few Palestinians who acted as witnesses to the wedding.

After marrying Arafat, Suha converted to Islam and moved to Tunisia to be close to Arafat since the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) had relocated its headquarters there.

Arafat and Suha’s marriage became public knowledge only in 1992 after Suha visited Libya to inquire about Arafat’s fate after his plane crashed in the Libyan desert.

On July 24, 1995, Suha gave birth to a girl. Arafat named the baby “Zahwa”, in honour of his late mother who died in 1933.

After Arafat’s death, Suha lived in Tunisia for a while, and was granted the country’s citizenship.

But following reported disputes with Leila Bin Ali, wife of the then-Tunisian leader Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, she was forced to leave the country and her citizenship was annulled.

The mother and daughter have been living in Malta since then.

Suha says she receives a monthly remuneration from the Palestinian Authority, equivalent to her late husband’s retirement pay for duties and responsibilities he had shouldered.

So it was of course the same DNA substance.

You can imagine how much, technically… it’s very high technical work, when they wanted to be sure that it’s not somebody who was not Yasser Arafat. So they came to Malta and they took all this DNA, very meticulous DNA from the daughter, and they explained to her – it’s not easy for a girl her age to go into this psychologically dangerous position. But they compared the DNA and of course it was the same DNA, so they are sure that all these belongings belonged to Arafat.

We began this work nine months ago. It’s not a work of today or tomorrow, and it’s so difficult to keep the low profile of this investigation.

We had to find every single belonging of my husband, his medication, his watch, his necklace, every single belonging that we could examine. You know that medicine has improved so much. We waited three months because they put this substance in some, it’s very technical, a special laboratory, and they waited three months to know the rate of polonium [decay] in the substance, and how much.

And they discovered that he has a very high polonium substance… not the natural polonium, it means that a radioactive nuclear… this is a nuclear substance that only exists in the very advanced countries. I mean, I don’t need to remind you who owns it.

So we got into this very, very painful conclusion, but at least this removes this great burden on me, on my chest, that at least I’ve done something to explain to the Palestinian people, to the Arab and Muslim generation all over the world, that it was not a natural death, it was a crime.

Of course, after this result of the investigation, I would like to exhume, to ask the Palestinian Authority to help me and to help all the Palestinian people to exhume the body. The doctors said, if you go to any cemetery and take any bone now of dead people, you will not find polonium in it. So if you take of Yasser Arafat’s bones, so that we can exhume the body… or even the soil surrounding it, we have a huge possibility to… you know how meticulous are the Swiss? They are sure, but they want even to be more sure. They would tell us, the sooner the better, to take the bones, because with time the polonium would [disappear].

If there had been poisoning by radioactive polonium, it would have been all over the bones. So I mean, with all my respect to the Palestinian Authority, I know they’ve been trying to discover what Yasser died from – and now we are helping them, we have very substantial, very important results from the best doctors in the world, that are having their credibility and their reputation at stake.

Nasser Kudwa was doing his own work, he’s working with the Arafat Foundation on other things, and I respect what Nasser Kudwa is doing, and what the Palestinian Authority are doing. But this is my duty as a wife and a mother I thought, because nobody could give all this information without my… the laboratory will not accept anybody else, not any official, only the wife, or the daughter when she is 18.

So I used my capacity as a direct family. The Swiss laboratory had to have my approval. The doctors in France had to have my approval to give all the reports… actually, I asked the French hospital, Percy Hospital, to give me samples of the urine and blood of Yasser Arafat, and they said we destroyed it, that was the answer. We destroyed it because nobody asked to have them.

I was not satisfied with that answer. Usually a very important person, like Yasser Arafat, they would keep traces – maybe they don’t want to be involved in it? But after we had all this, we got our own investigation. But blood would have been also another push for us… we’ve been working, I’ve been making letters to more than fifty doctors who were involved, to give them information.

Some of them did give information, some did not, because it’s a secret. Some told us it’s defence secrets, and they cannot release defence secrets. It was not an easy investigation.

Al Jazeera: What was it like for you, basically revisiting your husband’s death, retrieving his old belongings, going through this whole process again?

It was very, very painful. You can’t imagine. And the most painful thing is that my daughter knew about it, because she had to give us DNA, and I had to give my DNA. I will tell you, it was very painful to keep the secret like this, to go into all the memories. You can imagine going again into the hospital.

And more and more, as we discovered the ambiguity of the inquiry, people would not want to talk, would say it’s defence secrets, would say it’s forbidden for us to say, people were afraid to lose their jobs – everyone did not want to talk, even with letters from me.

It was painful, but it built our conviction again and again that it was a plot. And when you see all the declarations of the Israeli leaders, the American administration, the Bush administration about Arafat, that he is irrelevant, that we have to get rid of him, that he is an obstacle for peace… and when you see Sharon’s declaration that we have to kill him, help God in taking Arafat, it’s all like a flashback, coming and going. We were always in tears.

And to witness the Arab revolutions – all these people who got rid of their leaders – and yet people still go to Arafat’s tomb, to implore him for help like he was a saint. We must be proud of this, as Palestinian people.

I believe in justice. If you don’t get your justice in life, you get it in death. What’s happened now with the Arab revolutions is justice.

Al Jazeera: What impact do you think this might have on his legacy?

I think his legacy was always – he had always a great legacy. But this will make him, you know – will glorify more his legacy, will get people to go more into his footsteps, not giving up the land. He will allow the negotiators, our negotiators to be even more shrewd, more aggressive, that Israel maybe did not want peace during Arafat, so we have to be more and more stubborn about peace.

But his legacy – everybody loves him. People were doubting this but now we have the proof, and his legacy will be more and more as a great leader from our century, one of the great leaders of all the world. This will intensify this down-to-earth, lovable, humble person at the same time as we are witnessing dictatorships going one after another.

Al Jazeera: To exhume and study his body would require permission from both the Palestinian Authority and the Israeli government. Are you optimistic you’ll receive that?

I doubt about Israel, but I think that if there is a very important laboratory as the Swiss are – with some intervention, maybe the Israelis would want to oblige, if there is pressure.

But I think the Palestinian Authority will not mind this, because we have credible people, and I think the Palestinian Authority will want to know the truth.

Al Jazeera: Talk about what it’s been like for you over the last, almost eight years, since his death.

There’s justice in life. Sometimes God brings this justice to us… yesterday, there was in the press, reports that the Hamas authority discovered Palestinian spies working for Israel, one of them for forty years, one for twenty.

There have been video allegations, confessions… one of them spoke about what he did for Rantissi, building bombs, moving information, but one of them, the most dangerous, said it has been my mission for twenty years, just the file of Suha Arafat, to destroy her image, to make allegations everywhere. Can you imagine? If they used Palestinian spies for this, what they would do in the international media, and the Jewish-controlled media in the United States, and all over.

So I say that truth will prevail, and justice will prevail in any way, and… it was very difficult to live with these allegations, because before I used to live with these allegations, and Yasser was here. He was here to protect me, and he would tell me, Suha, don’t worry, it’s not you they are attacking, it is me, by you. But by attacking me they want to attack his legacy when he died… it’s been eight years they were attacking him in every single place.

And the truth will prevail, that he has nothing to do with all these cases, but I pay the price of being his wife… we are the continuation of his family, of his legacy. All these people that were putting bad media – look where they are now, some of them in the Arab world… it was, I don’t tell you it was easy, it was a challenge, a continuous challenge.

You wake up in the morning and you don’t know what this day reserves for me, what they’re going to do, what kind of allegations they will spread… and unfortunately people believe because it’s amusing to speak about others. But I’m proud that with all that happened, that at least for me, it’s like a burden removed.

Al Jazeera: If the next batch of tests find more conclusive evidence, do you think it will change anything on the ground in Palestine?

It will change a lot of things in Palestine. It will remove a lot of doubt. You know, people would say, Arafat wanted to – there’s a lot of people who say that Arafat wanted not to make peace, he did not accept Camp David, a lot of criticism.

Arafat wanted to arrive with the Palestinian cause to a Palestinian state, and because of this they got rid of him. Of course it will change, it will not permit any negotiator to give up Arafat’s core principles. Jerusalem, the 1967 borders, the right of return, prisoners, water, everything – especially the right of return.

No other negotiator, no other Palestinian negotiator now or in fifty years, will dare to negotiate what Yasser Arafat has planted in the roots of our thinking. If you see today, the meeting was cancelled with Mofaz and the president, because people do not Mofaz to come next to the grave of Yasser Arafat – because he was minister of defence when Arafat was killed.

People are rising up from inside, you know.

(www.aljazeera.com / 03.07.2012)

IMF refuses to give $1bn loan to the PA

IMF refuses to give $1bn loan to the PAThe International Monetary Fund (IMF) has rejected a request from Benjamin Netanyahu to offer the Palestinian Authority a $1 billion loan, because the PA “is not a state”. The Israeli Prime Minister made the request via the governor of the Bank of Israel, Stanley Fischer, after discussions about the PA’s financial crisis with the Ramallah Prime Minister Salam Fayyad.

If agreed, the loan would have been repaid through Israel. The IMF said that it rejected the Israeli request because it did not want to set a precedent of a state taking a loan on behalf of a non-state entity. It is believed that the request was made in April during the IMF’s annual conference in Washington.

Fayyad told Fischer that Europe and the US are unable to increase their financial support for the PA because of the economic crisis; Arab States are not transferring the funds they have promised; and Palestinian banks are refusing to extend any more credit to the government due to its inability to make debt repayments. Insider sources claim that Fayyad and Fischer are still discussing the financial problems in the hope of finding a solution and preventing the potential collapse of the authority.

(www.middleeastmonitor.com / 03.07.2012)

Internationals, Palestinians, and Israelis Begin Rebuilding of Palestinian Home for Fifth Time

Israel Treats Every Palestinian Child as “Potential Terrorist”: UK study

A new report funded and supported by the UK government that accuses Israel of violating international law with its treatment of Palestinian child detainees was launched in London by a high-profile group of human rights lawyers on Tuesday.

The report says Israel is in violation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) on at least six counts and of the Fourth Geneva Convention on at least two counts. It lays bare the system of legal apartheid Israel maintains in Palestine.

But there is pessimism in some quarters that the report’s recommendations will be implemented. The document has been criticized as “toothless” by a prominent Palestinian human rights activist.

“Children in Military Custody” was funded and backed by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and written by an ad hoc group including a former attorney general, a former court of appeal judge and several prominent attorneys known as QCs. The delegation visited Palestine in September and met with Palestinian, Israeli and international nongovernmental organizations, British diplomats and a wide range of Israeli government and military officials.

The report details the military law Israel applies to all Palestinians in the occupied West Bank, including children, and how it differs from the civilian law applied to Israeli settlers who live in the same territory. It states there it was “uncontested [by Israel] that there are major differentials between the law governing the treatment of Palestinian children and the law governing treatment of Israeli children.”

Unequal treatment of children

At the heart of the report are three core recommendations to the Israeli government: start applying international law to the West Bank (which Israel refuses to do), the best interests of the child should come first and, crucially, that Israel “should deal with Palestinian children on an equal footing with Israeli children.”

Israel currently applies two separate and unequal systems of laws in the West Bank. Palestinians are subject to a harsh military regime in which Israeli army officers and police, arrest, interrogate, judge and sentence, while Israeli settlers colonizing the West Bank are subject to Israeli civilian law.

These systematic inequalities include: the minimum age for Palestinian children to receive a custodial sentence is 12, but for Israelis it is 14; Palestinian children have no right to have a parent present during interrogation, while Israeli children generally do.

The most stark inequalities are evident in the time it takes for the two systems to work. Palestinian children could have to wait up to eight days before being brought before a judge, while Israeli children have a right to see one within 24 hours; Palestinian children can be detained without charge for 188 days, while for Israelis the limit is 40.

In a press release about the report, Council for Arab-British Understanding director Chris Doyle describes witnessing in Palestine “nothing less than a kangaroo court that does nothing to improve Israel’s security while criminalizing an entire generation of Palestinian children.”

Children kept in solitary confinement

Drawing on their meetings with nongovernmental organizations such asDefence for Children International-Palestine Section, the authors detail the shocking treatment of Palestinian children at the hands of Israeli soldiers.

Arrested in nighttime raids, Palestinian children are often physically and verbally abused, brought before adult military courts, shackled, given little choice than taking a plea bargain, and can be sentenced to as many as 20 years for “crimes” as trivial as stone throwing. Some are even kept in solitary confinement, according to DCI.

When Palestinian children file complaints about their abuse at the hands of Israeli soldiers, they are almost always ignored. Israeli occupation authorities were able to give to the delegation “only one example of a complaint being upheld.” The authors report that there are “a significant number of allegations of physical and emotional abuse of child detainees by the military which neither the complaints system nor the justice system is addressing satisfactorily.”

The report compiles some shocking statistics. As many as 94 percent of Palestinian children arrested in the West Bank are denied bail, according to nongovernmental organizations. Some 97-98 percent of such cases end with a plea bargain, meaning they go to jail without even reaching the trial stage (as flawed as military courts are).

A key conclusion reached by the report’s authors is that Israel is in breach of articles of UN Convention of the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) that prohibit: national or ethnic discrimination; ignoring a child’s best interests; the premature resort to detention, imprisonment and trial alongside adult prisoners; preventing prompt access to lawyers and the use of shackles.

While the report notes “the International Court of Justice’s 2004 Advisory Opinion [on Israel’s wall in the West Bank] which concludes categorically that the UNCRC is applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territories,” Israeli officials the delegation met with refused to recognize this.

“Every Palestinian child a ‘potential terrorist’”

“In our meetings with the various Israeli Government agencies, we found the universal stance by contrast was that the Convention has no application beyond Israel’s own [pre-1967] borders,” the authors write, noting their disagreement.

They emphasize: “[t]he population of the West Bank is within the physical power and control of Israel, and Israel has effective control of the territory. Our visit dispelled any doubts we might have had about this.”

In its conclusions, the report notes that this refusal to fulfill its international law obligations with respect to Palestinian children probably “stems from a belief, which was advanced to us by [an Israeli] military prosecutor, that every Palestinian child is a ‘potential terrorist.’”

Questions about report’s future

Renowned Palestinian writer, activist and academic Ghada Karmi was at the report’s launch on Tuesday. She asked the panel if it would be doing a follow-up visit, or monitoring implementation of the report’s recommendations.

The answer was less than conclusive, with co-author Greg Davies saying they would have to “wait and see” what the Israeli government’s response would be. He later spoke to The Electronic Intifada over the phone about the report’s future: “the format in which that follow-up work takes place, I don’t know at this stage, it’s too early to tell … I’m committed to seeing as far as it’s possible these recommendations coming into effect. If that requires further work I’m prepared to organize that.”

Karmi later told The Electronic Intifada that the report is “toothless in the end” because there is no way to compel Israel to comply.

“Palestinians are fed up of being studied,” she said. What they really want to know is “how will I get help to end” the abuses of the military occupation. Karmi did however conclude the report was a good thing and the delegation was a “very interesting mission” because it was backed by the foreign office, who could not be accused of anti-Israel bias in the same way that Israel has managed to taint UN missions with “the usual slanders.”

UK government approached report’s authors

Lawyer Greg Davies was responsible for putting the ad hoc delegation together. He told The Electronic Intifada that while he was doing so, he was approached by the British Consulate in Jerusalem, who offered government funding. Davies replied in the affirmative, but on condition that the group be independent.

In response to such criticisms as Karmi’s, Davies said: “there have been a number of [such] reports submitted… those reports have largely gone unanswered [by Israel] … it was that lack of response that prompted this.”

“There isn’t an enforceability as such without the political will, and that’s where our remit stops,” he said, pointing to an Early Day Motion on the report tabled in parliament Wednesday. EDM 280 welcomes the report and “asks the Foreign Secretary to make a statement to the House [of Commons] setting out his proposals for persuading Israel to comply in practice with international law relating to the treatment of children.” Davies said of the EDM “we welcome that and are hugely encouraged by that.”

Advancing the debate

The Palestine section of Defence for Children International, through its reports and its meetings with the delegation, is one of the most quoted sources in the report. DCI-PS spokesperson Gerard Horton admitted to The Electronic Intifada that the report’s recommendations “won’t end the abuse,” but argued that some of them “will make it very difficult for the military court system to function effectively” if they were implemented.

He wrote in an email that the report’s list of forty recommendations include those DCI-PS have been demanding for years (parents present during interrogation; prompt access to a lawyer; audio-visual recording of interrogations; and an end to forcible transfer of children to prisons inside Israel in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention).

Horton also highlighted the high profile of the report’s authors and backers: “the importance of this report is who wrote it … before real change can occur the debate has to become mainstream. People in the center and center-right have to start taking an interest and expressing a concern. To my mind this report goes some way to advancing that by helping to shift the debate to the center.”

“Justice is not a negotiable commodity”

Among the report’s forty specific recommendations are: an end to night arrests, an end to blindfolding and shackling, observing the prohibition on “violent, threatening or coercive” conduct, the presence of a parent during interrogation and “[c]hildren should not be required to sign confessions” in Hebrew, since they do not understand it.

The report notes that since the delegation’s visit, a new military order has upped to 18 the age at which Palestinian children can be tried as adults. Previously, it had been 16 (then another inequality with Israeli children who are treated as children until 18).

But there are concerns this change has been rendered void in practice. While welcoming the change, the report expresses concern “that the change does not appear to apply to sentencing provisions.”

Seemingly deliberate loopholes in the law means that “adult sentencing provisions still apply to 16 [and] 17 year olds” and that children 14-17 years old can be sentenced as adults when the maximum penalty for the offense is five years or more. The maximum penalty for throwing stones (the most common offense) ranges from 10 to 20 years,

Asked by The Electronic Intifada at the Tuesday launch why there were no specific recommendations in the report to end this inequality, Judy Khan QC said it was covered by core recommendation three, which calls for an end to the current inequalities between Israeli and Palestinian child detainees.

In their meetings with the delegation, the Israeli Ministry of Justice “described [such changes] as conditional on there being no significant unrest or ‘third intifada.’” The report objects: “[a] major cause of future unrest may well be the resentment of continuing injustice … justice is not a negotiable commodity but a fundamental human right.”

Sharp rise in child detainees

Sir Stephen Sedley, a former Lord Justice — senior appeal judge — underlined at Tuesday’s launch that there has been a 40 percent rise in child detainees since their visit in September, so the problem has only got worse since they returned to the UK.

While the report seems to have received some media coverage in the UK, it yet remains to be seen what practical impact it will have. More fundamentally, it does not call for an end to the occupation, considering political solutions beyond the authors’ mandate. It does note however that: “We have no reason to differ from the view of Her Majesty’s Government and the international community that these [Israeli] settlements [in the West Bank] are illegal. For the purposes of this report however we treat them, like the occupation, as a fact.”

But the question remains: a fact for how much longer?

(www.indypendent.org / 03.07.2012)

Ramallah: Hundreds demand to end negotiations with Israel

Hundreds of protesters demonstrated in Ramallah calling on the Palestinian Authority to end negotiations with Israel. Protesters gathered at the Manara square, chanting “The people want to bring down Oslo,” referring to the 1993 agreement that established the Palestinian Authority. On Friday and Saturday Palestinian police violently shut down protests denouncing talks with Israeli vice premier Shaul Mofaz.

(www.alternativenews.org / 03.07.2012)

Trade union: 15,000 workmen exposed to daily Israeli abuse at Tayeba crossing

TULKAREM, (PIC)– The struggle of workmen bloc in Tulkarem city said 15,000 Palestinians from the northern provinces of the West Bank, including workmen, drivers and traders, are exposed daily to different kind of Israeli maltreatment at Tayeba checkpoint in the city.

The daily Israeli violations against the workmen and drivers prompted them more than once to stage protests at the checkpoint, secretary of the bloc Ziyad Ghanem stated.

Ghanem said that the Israeli security company responsible for the checkpoint wage an orgy of violence, harassment and humiliation against those workmen and drivers, and the Tayeba checkpoint is considered the only crossing for them in their northern areas of the West Bank.

He noted that the Israeli occupation authority declared the Tiba checkpoint as the only crossing that should be used for the movement of goods and workmen in the north.

(occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com / 03.07.2012)

Why Boycott?

Ahava promises “Beauty Secrets from the Dead Sea.” And wait until you hear those secrets!

Because Ahava is hiding the ugly truth—its products actually come from stolen Palestinian natural resources in the Occupied Territory of the Palestinian West Bank, and are produced in the illegal settlement of Mitzpe Shalem. Don’t let the “Made in Israel” sticker fool you—when you buy Ahava products you help finance the destruction of hope for a peaceful and just future for both Israelis and Palestinians.

Ahava puts a pretty face on its crimes, even paying Oxfam Ambassador and “Sex in the City” star Kristen Davis to be its spokeswoman. But here’s what Oxfam itself has to say about Ahava’s deceptive packaging:

  • “The settlements on the West Bank are illegal under international humanitarian law and that creates a lot of problems for the Palestinians that live there.”
  • “Consumers that are buying produce that are grown in illegal settlements need to have that information so that they can make an informed choice.”
(www.stolenbeauty.org / 03.07.2012)

Fights break out at Syrian opposition meeting in Cairo

CAIRO (Reuters) — A meeting of Syria’s splintered opposition in Cairo on Tuesday descended into scuffles and fistfights that will dishearten Western leaders calling for unity against Bashar Assad.
A Syrian Kurdish group quit the meeting, sparking mayhem and cries of “scandal, scandal” from some delegates. Women wept as men traded blows, and staff of the hotel used for the meeting hurriedly removed tables and chairs as the scuffles spread.

“The Kurds withdrew because the conference rejected an item that says the Kurdish people must be recognized,” said Abdel Aziz Othman of the National Kurdish Council. “This is unfair and we will no longer accept to be marginalized.”

Sixteen months into an uprising against Assad, the failure to rally Syria’s disparate religious and ethnic groups behind a united leadership will make it more difficult to secure international recognition.

“This is so sad. It will have a bad implications for all parties. It will make the Syrian opposition look bad and demoralise the protesters on the ground,” said an opposition activist, 27-year-old Gawad al-Khatib.

Assad has clung on far longer than other Arab leaders who faced popular uprisings, in part due to his willingness to use overwhelming force but also because of divisions among his population, the opposition and the international community.

Russia, Syria’s longtime ally, opposes U.N. action proposed by Western powers. The United States and European powers have themselves shown no appetite for military intervention of the kind they used in Libya.

A diplomat from the meeting’s host, the Arab League, said the often “chaotic” opposition had made progress by agreeing on documents outlining principles to shape a new constitution and guide any transition.

(www.maannews.net / 03.07.2012)

‘Radioactive element’ on Arafat belongings

Palestinians hold candles and a poster depicting late Palestinian president Yasser Arafat during a ceremony making the anniversary of his death in the southern Gaza Strip
BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — Items belonging to late president Yasser Arafat were found to have been contaminated by a rare and radioactive element, Al Jazeera reported Tuesday.

Arafat, who fell ill while besieged in his compound in Ramallah, eventually passed away in October 2004 in a Paris hospital. Mystery surrounded his cause of death.

Now, Al Jazeera says the Swiss Institut de Radiophysique has proof that Arafat’s personal belongings contained abnormal levels of a rare and radioactive element called polonium.

Dr Francois Bochud of the institute was quoted as saying “an unexplained, elevated amount of unsupported polonium-210″ was found on belongings like Arafat’s toothbrush and iconic kuffiya.

The substance is believed to be the same which killed Alexander Litvinenko, a former Russian spy who died after falling ill in 2006 in London, Al Jazeera reported.

(www.maannews.net / 03.07.2012)
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 622 other followers