• Archives

  • Categories

  • Altahrir Nieuws (Magazine)

Zuid-Afrika en Denemarken gaan verbieden dat producten uit nederzettingen ‘made in Israel’ heten

De campagne voor BDS (Boycot Divestment and Sanctions) heeft een geweldige impuls gekregen nadat de Zuidafrikaanse regering bekend heeft gemaakt dat zij korte metten wil maken met de praktijk dat producten uit de Israelische nederzettingen ten onrechte gelabeld worden als ‘Made in Israel’. De maatregel moet nog van kracht worden, maar intussen is een waarschuwing uitgegaan aan handelaren dat producten uit de bezette gebieden niet langer als producten van Israel mogen worden aangemerkt. Aan de stap, die bekend werd gemaakt door de Zuidafrikaanse minister van handel en Industrie Rob Davies (die – pikant detail – zelf Joods is), is anderhalf jaar lobbyen vooraf gegaan van de groepen Open Shuhada Street, Attorneys for Human Rights and BDS South Africa, samen met het Coördinatie Commissie van de Palestijnse Volksverzetscomités.
En nauwelijks was dat bekend geworden of ook Denemarken maakte bekend het Zuidafrikaanse voorbeeld te gaan volgen.

Dit schreef de Zuidafrikaanse krant Mail & Guardian:   
The Palestinian campaign to boycott goods produced in Jewish settlements in the West Bank has received a boost from abroad with an unprecedented South African proposal to have the name of Israel dropped from labels on merchandise made in the settlements.
The South African government issued a notice saying it wants to require merchants “not to incorrectly label products that originate from the Occupied Palestinian Territory as products of Israel”.
The notice did not specify what the labels should say and the proposal has not yet taken effect, pending public objections that can be submitted through the end of June.
But Israel claims it is being singled out because special labels are not applied to products made in dozens of other places where territorial conflicts exist.
“All these things are characteristic of racism,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Yigal Palmor said on Sunday. Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon said Israel would summon the South African ambassador to protest the proposal.
Palestinians and their supporters, inspired by the economic boycott of apartheid-era South Africa, have been trying for years to spark a punishing economic war on Israel to force it to end its occupation of lands Palestinians claim for a future state.

En dit schreef Haaretz naar aanleiding van de Deense stap:

Denmark is planning to ban labeling products from Israeli settlements in the West Bank as “Made in Israel,” the foreign minister told Danish media on Saturday. The move follows reports of similar plans announced this month by South Africa’s government.
“This is a step that clearly shows consumers that the products are produced under conditions that not only the Danish government, but also European governments, do not approve of,” Foreign Minister Villy Søvndal Søvndal told Politiken newspaper. “It will then be up to consumers whether they choose to buy the products or not. 
Sinds 2005 zijn in Europa – op papier – producten uit de nederzettingen, die immers allemaal onwettig zijn,  uitgezonderd van de preferentiële behandeling die producten uit Israel ten deel vallen onder de handels- en douaneovereenkomsten tussen Israel en de EU. Het is echter een papieren maatregel gebleven. De EU maakt er geen werk van en knijpt in de praktijk een oogje dicht. Tot nu toe maakt alleen Groot-Brittannië verschil. Daar is het namelijk sinds 2009 usance dat op de labels onderscheid wordt gemaakt tussen producten uit Israel, uit de nederzettingen of uit de Palestijnse gebieden.
De besluiten van Zuid-Afrika en Denemarken zijn belangrijke stappen voorwaarts voor de BDS-beweging. Nu zou de EU eindelijk ook eens haar papieren standpunt om moeten zetten in praktische maatregelen, om te laten blijken dat het haar ernst is met haar bezwaren tegen het nederzettingenprogramma.
En voor alle duidelijkheid: de opmerking van Yigal Palmor, de woordvoerder van het Israelische ministerie van buitenlandse zaken, dat deze maatregelen zouden zijn ingegeven door ‘racisme’ slaan natuurlijk echt helemaal nergens op. Alsof het racistisch zou zijn om op te komen voor het internationale recht.
(abu-pessoptimist.blogspot.com / 20.05.2012)

More than 60 killed in Syria despite presence of U.N. monitors

The head of a Syria ceasefire monitoring mission was stopped at an army checkpoint in Douma when a bomb detonated nearby. (Reuters)

The head of a Syria ceasefire monitoring mission was stopped at an army checkpoint in Douma when a bomb detonated nearby.
More than 60 people were killed nationwide in Syria on Sunday, including at least 34 people in central Hama province, which came under heavy army shelling for hours, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported.

“Thirty-four people were killed under shelling and gunfire in Souran village while it was being raided,” the Britain-based watchdog said, revising up an earlier toll of 16 people killed, including three children.

The bloody violence continues despite the existence of a U.N. mission, whose members were targeted hours earlier with a rocket-propelled grenade in the town of Douma, north of Damascus.

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory said “there is no evidence that there were any clashes taking place” in the village of Souran before the deadly shelling took place.

The Syrian Revolution Commission reported that a total of 28 people were killed across the country as deadly violence continued despite the existence of a U.N. observer mission tasked to watch a non-existent ceasefire.

Early on Sunday, a rocket-propelled grenade landed near a team of observers visiting the town of Douma, a northern suburb of Damascus, according to an AFP correspondent at the scene.

The head of a Syria ceasefire monitoring mission, Major General Robert Mood, was stopped in a car at an army checkpoint when the bomb detonated in a nearby alleyway.

While there were no reports of casualties, it was an indication of the mounting dangers posed across the country from clashes between Syrian regime troops and armed rebel fighters, which had been witnessed in Douma before the bomb exploded.

Mood and U.N. peacekeeping chief Herve Ladsous were among the team of observers, the journalist added.

After the observers left the area, a civilian was shot dead in Douma by a sniper, local monitors reported.

The streets of Douma were deserted, and most of its shops were closed, according to AFP. Posters had been torn off the walls and rubbish containers overturned.

Pro- and anti-regime slogans filled the walls of what appeared to be a ghost town. “Douma will not kneel except before God,” read one slogan, while another read “Assad’s soldiers were here.”

“When the observers leave, the armed men will come back to cause trouble,” one soldier told reporters at the scene, in a reference to rebels who have taken up arms over the course of the anti-regime revolt.

In Basra al-Sham city of southern Daraa province, an army defector was killed in an overnight ambush by regime forces, the Observatory said.

In Jisr al-Shughur in northwest Idlib, a flashpoint of unrest, armed men assassinated a Baath party official, the monitor said, amid a marked increase of assassinations targeting people associated with the regime.

“There is definitely an increase in assassinations targeting people associated with the regime, be they officials or pro-regime businessmen,” Observatory head Rami Abdel Rahman told AFP news agency by telephone.

The monitoring group also said that fresh demonstrations took place in several areas of northwest Idlib and in Hama calling for the ouster of President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

In Daraa province, demonstrations were also held calling for the release of activist and citizen journalist Mohammed al-Hariri, who according to Reporters Without Borders (RSF) has been sentenced to death for “high treason.”

The latest demonstrations took place after fierce fighting between regime troops and armed rebels rocked parts of the Syrian capital Damascus overnight, the Observatory said.

“Violent clashes broke out between rebel fighters and regime troops at a checkpoint in Kafr Sousa district,” it added.

The Local Coordination Committees, an anti-regime network of activists on the ground in Syria, said that in the wake of the fighting, Kafr Sousa in the south of the capital saw the “arrival of huge reinforcements” of regime troops.

Clashes also broke out in others parts of southern Damascus, the Observatory said, adding that gunfire had during the night echoed across the city Centre.

On Saturday, 23 people were killed in violence across Syria, the Observatory said.

More than 12,000 people, the majority of them civilians, have died in Syria since an anti-regime revolt broke out in March 2011, according to the monitoring group.

(english.alarabiya.net / 20.05.2012)

Jerusalem Day marchers clash with Palestinians

Israeli border police officers detain a Palestinian demonstrator who protested against a parade marking Jerusalem Day in front of Damascus Gate outside Jerusalem’s Old City on May 20, 2012. Jerusalem Day marks the anniversary of
Israel’s capture of the Eastern part of the city during the 1967 Middle East War.

JERUSALEM (Reuters) — Right-wing Israeli marchers scuffled with Palestinians as a procession marking the Israel’s annexation of East Jerusalem entered the old city’s Muslim quarter on Sunday, police said.

Tens of thousands of Israelis turned out to celebrate the anniversary of the capture of the territory in a 1967 war.

Fifteen people were arrested after fighting between some marchers and Palestinians who gathered outside the Old City walls, said police.

“Ten Jews were arrested for calling out racist slurs and attacking Arabs. Five Arabs (were arrested) for throwing objects and attacking (Israelis),” Jerusalem’s police force said in a statement.

Earlier, two Israeli Knesset members toured the Al-Aqsa compound accompanied by over 20 right-wing activists as part of Jerusalem Day celebrations, Israeli daily Haaretz reported.

Palestinians regard East Jerusalem as the capital of an independent state they hope to establish in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In 1980, Israel’s parliament passed a law declaring united Jerusalem as the national capital, a move never recognised internationally.

“Israel without Jerusalem is like a body without a heart,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said at a commemoration ceremony on Sunday. “It will never be divided again.”

PLO official Saeb Erekat condemned the celebrations, saying they were “clear proof that peace is not part of the Israeli government’s agenda.”

Peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians collapsed in 2010 a few weeks after they began.

(www.maannews.net / 20.05.2012)

The Status of Woman in Islam

The status of woman in Islam constitutes no problem. The attitude of the Qur’an and the early Muslims bear witness to the fact that woman is, at least, as vital to life as man himself, and that she is not inferior to him nor is she one of the lower species. Had it not been for the impact of foreign cultures and alien influences, this question would have never arisen among the Muslims. The status of woman was taken for granted to be equal to that of man. It was a matter of course, a matter of fact, and no one, then, considered it as a problem at all.

In order to understand what Islam has established for woman, there is no need to deplore her plight in the pre-Islamic era or in the modern world of today. Islam has given woman rights and privileges which she has never enjoyed under other religious or constitutional systems. This can be understood when the matter is studied as a whole in a comparative manner, rather than partially. The rights and responsibilities of a woman are equal to those of a man but they are not necessarily identical with them. Equality and sameness are two quite different things. This difference is understandable because man and woman are not identical but they are created equals. With this distinction in mind, There is no problem. It is almost impossible to find even two identical men or women.

This distinction between equality and sameness is of paramount importance. Equality is desirable, just, fair; but sameness is not. People are not created identical but they are created equals. With this distinction in mind, there is no room to imagine that woman is inferior to man. There is no ground to assume that she is less important than he just because her rights are not identically the same as his. Had her status been identical with his, she would have been simply a duplicate of him, which she is not. The fact that Islam gives her equal rights – but not identical – shows that it takes her into due consideration, acknowledges her, and recognizes her independent personality.

It is not the tone of Islam that brands woman as the product of the devil or the seed of evil. Nor does the Qur’an place man as the dominant lord of woman who has no choice but to surrender to his dominance. Nor was it Islam that introduced the question of whether or not woman has any soul in her. Never in the history of Islam has any Muslim doubted the human status of woman or her possession of soul and other fine spiritual qualities. Unlike other popular beliefs, Islam does not blame Eve alone for the First Sin. The Qur’an makes it very clear that both Adam and Eve were tempted; that they both sinned; that God’s pardon was granted to both after their repentance; and that God addressed them jointly. (2:35-36); 7:19, 27; 20:117-123). In fact the Qur’an gives the impression that Adam was more to blame for that First Sin from which emerged prejudice against woman and suspicion of her deeds. But Islam does not justify such prejudice or suspicion because both Adam and Eve were equally in error, and if we are to blame Eve we should blame Adam as much or even more.

The status of woman in Islam is something unique, something novel, something that has no similarity in any other system. If we look to the Eastern Communist world or to the democratic nations, we find that woman is not really in a happy position. Her status is not enviable. She has to work so hard to live, and sometimes she may be doing the same job that a man does but her wage is less than his. She enjoys a kind of liberty which in some cases amounts to libertinism. To get to where she is nowadays, woman struggled hard for decades and centuries. To gain the right of learning and the freedom of work and earning, she had to offer painful sacrifices and give up many of her natural rights. To establish her status as a human being possessing a soul, she paid heavily. Yet in spite of all these costly sacrificeqs and painful struggles, she has not acquired what Islam has established by a Divine decree for the Muslim woman.

The rights of woman of modern times were not granted voluntarily or out of kindness to the female. Modern woman reached her present position by force, and not through natural processes or mutual consent or Divine teachings. She had to force her way, and various circumstances came to her aid. Shortage of manpower during wars, pressure of economic needs and requirements of industrial developments forced woman to get out of her home – to work, to learn, to struggle for her livelihood, to appear as an equal to man, to run her race in the course of life side by side with him. She was forced by circumstances and in turn she forced herself through and acquired her new status. Whether all women were pleased with these circumstances being on their side, and whether they are happy and satisfied with the results of this course is a different matter. But the fact remains that whatever rights modern woman enjoys fall short of those of her Muslim counterpart. What Islam has established for woman is that which suits her nature, gives her full security and protects her against disgraceful circumstances and uncertain channels of life. We do not need here to elaborate on the status of modern woman and the risks she runs to make her living or establish herself. We do not even need to explore the miseries and setbacks that encircle her as a result of the so-called rights of woman. Nor do we intend to manipulate the situation of many unhappy homes which break because of the very “freedom” and “rights” of which modern woman is proud. Most women today exercise the right of freedom to go out independently, to work and earn, to pretend to be equal to man, but this, sadly enough, is at the expense of their families. This all known and obvious. What is not known is the status of woman in Islam. An attempt will be made in the following passages to sum up the attitude of Islam with regard to woman.

Woman is recognized by Islam as a full and equal partner of man in the procreation of humankind. He is the father; she is the mother, and both are essential for life. Her role is not less vital than his. By this partnership she has an equal share in every aspect; she is entitled to equal rights; she undertakes equal responsibilities, and in her there are as many qualities and as much humanity as there are in her partner. To this equal partner- ship in the reproduction of human kind God says:

O mankind! Verily We have created your from a single (pair) of a male and a female,m and made you into nations and tribes that you may know each other… (Qur’an, 49:13; cf. 4:1).

She is equal to man in bearing personal and common responsibilities and in receiving rewards for her deeds. She is acknowledged as an independent personality, in possession of human qualities and worthy of spiritual aspirations. Her human nature is neither inferior to nor deviant from that of man. Both are members of one another. God says:

And their Lord has accepted (their prayers) and answered them (saying): ‘Never will I cause to be lost the work of any of you, be he male or female; you are members, one of another… (3:195; cf 9:71;33:35-36;66:19-21).

She is equal to man in the pursuit of education and knowledge. When Islam enjoins the seeking of knowledge upon Muslims, it makes no distinction between man and woman. Almost fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad declared that the pursuit of knowledge is incumbent on every Muslim male and female. This declaration was very clear and was implemented by Muslims throughout history.

She is entitled to freedom of expression as much as man is. Her sound opinions are taken into consideration and cannot be disregarded just because she happen to belong to the female sex. It is reported in the Qur’an and history that woman not only expressed her opinion freely but also argued and participated in serious discussions with the Prophet himself as well as with other Muslim leaders (Qur’an, 58:1-4; 60:10-12). Besides there were occasions when Muslim women expressed their views on legislative matters of public interest, and stood in opposition to the Caliphs, who then accepted the sound arguments of these women. A specific example took place during the Califate of Umar Ibn al-Khattab.

Historical records show that women participated in public life with the early Muslims, especially in times of emergencies. Women used to accompany the Muslim armies engaged in battles to nurse the wounded, prepare supplies, serve the warriors, and so on. They were not shut behind iron bars or considered worthless creatures and deprived of souls.

Islam grants woman equal rights to contract, to enterprise, to earn and possess independently. Her life, her property, her honor are as sacred as those of man. If she commits any offense, her penalty is no less or more than of man’s in a similar case. If she is wronged or harmed, she gets due compensations equal to what a man in her position would get (2:178;4:45, 92-93).

Islam does not state these rights in a statistical form and then relax. It has taken all measures to safeguard them and put them into practice as integral articles of Faith. It never tolerates those who are inclined to prejudice against woman or discrimination between man and woman. Time and again, the Qur’an reproaches those who used to believe woman to be inferior to man (16:57-59, 62; 42:47-59; 43:15-19; 53:21-23).

Apart from recognition of woman as an independent human being acknowledged as equally essential for the survival of humanity, Islam has given her a share of inheritance. Before Islam, she was not only deprived of that share but was herself considered as property to be inherited by man. Out of that transferable property Islam made an heir, acknowledging the inherent human qualifies in woman. Whether she is a wife or mother, a sister or daughter, she receives a certain share of the deceased kin’s property, a share which depends on her degree of relationship to the deceased and the number of heirs. This share is hers, and no one can take it away or disinherit her. Even if the deceased wishes to deprive her by making a will to other relations or in favor of any other cause, the Law will not allow him to do so. Any proprietor is permitted to make his will within the limit of one-third of his property, so he may not affect the rights of his heirs, men and women. In the case of inheritance, the question of quality and sameness is fully applicable. In principle, both man and woman are equally entitled to inherit the property of the deceased relations but the portions they get may vary. In some instances man receives two shares whereas woman gets one only. This no sign of giving preference or supremacy to man over woman.The reasons why man gets more in these particular instances may be classified as follows:

First man, is the person solely responsible for the complete maintenance of his wife, his family and any other needy relations. It is his duty by Law to assume all financial responsibilities and maintain his dependents adequately. It is also his duty to contribute financially to all good causes in his society. All financial burdens are borne by him alone.

Secondly, in contrast, woman has no financial responsibilities whatsoever except very little of her personal expenses, the high luxurious things that she likes to have. She is financially secure and provided for. If she is a wife, her husband is the provider; if she is a mother, it is the son; if she is a daughter, it is the father; if she is a sister; it is the brother, and so on. If she has no relations on whom she can depend, then there is no question of inheritance because there is nothing to inherit and there is no one to bequeath anything to her. However, she will not be left to starve, maintenance of such a woman is the responsibility of the society as a whole, the state. She may be given aid or a job to earn her living, and whatever money she makes will be hers. She is not responsible for the maintenance of anybody else besides herself. If there is a man in her position, he would still be responsible for his family and possibly any of his relations who need his help. So, in the hardest situation her financial responsibility is limited, while his is unlimited.

Thirdly, when a woman gets less than a man does, she is not actually deprived of anything that she has worked for. The property inherited is not the result of her earning or her endeavors. It is something coming to them from a neutral source, something additional or extra. It is something that neither man or woman struggled for. It is a sort of aid, and any aid has to be distributed according to the urgent needs and responsibilities especially when the distribution is regulated by the Law of God.

Now, we have a male heir, on one side, burdened with all kinds of financial responsibilities and liabilities. We have, on the other side, a female heir with no financial responsibilities at all or at most with very little of it. In between we have some property and aid to redistribute by way of inheritance. If we deprive the female completely, it would be unjust to her because she is related to the deceased. Likewise, if we always give her a share equal to the man’s, it would be unjust to him. So, instead of doing injustice to either side, Islam gives the man a larger portion of the inherited property to help him to meet his family needs and social responsibilities. At the same time, Islam has not forgotten her altogether, but has given her a portion to satisfy her very personal needs. In fact, Islam in this respect is being more kind to her than to him. Here we can say that when taken as a whole the rights of woman are equal to those of man although not necessarily identical (see Qur’an, 4:11-14, 176).

In some instances of bearing witness to certain civil contracts, two men are required or one man and two women. Again, this is no indication of the woman being inferior to man. It is a measure of securing the rights of the contracting parties, because woman as a rule, is not so experienced in practical life as man. This lack of experience may cause a loss to any party in a given contract. So the Law requires that at least two women should bear witness with one man. if a woman of the witness forgets something, the other one would remind her. Or if she makes an error, due to lack of experience, the other would help to correct her. This is a precautionary measure to guarantee honest transactions and proper dealings between people. In fact, it gives woman a role to play in civil life and helps to establish justice. At any rate, lack of experience in civil life does not necessarily mean that women is inferior to man in her status. Every human being lacks one thing or another, yet no one questions their human status (2:282).

Woman enjoys certain privileges of which man is deprived. She is exempt from some religious duties, i.e., prayers and fasting, in her regular periods and at times of confinement. She is exempt from all financial liabilities. As a mother, she enjoys more recognition and higher honor in the sight of God (31:14-15;46:15). The Prophet acknowledged this honor when he declared that Paradise is under the feet of the mothers. She is entitled to three-fourths of the son’s love and kindness with one-fourth left for their father. As a wife she is entitled to demand of her prospective husband a suitable dowry that will be her own. She is entitled to complete provision and total maintenance by the husband. She does not have to work or share with her husband the family expenses. She is free to retain, after marriage, whatever she possessed before it, and the husband has no right whatsoever to any of her belongings. As a daughter or sister she is entitled to security and provision by the father and brother respectively. That is her privilege. If she wishes to work or be self-supporting and participate in handling the family responsibilities, she is quite free to do so, provided her integrity and honor are safeguarded.

The standing of woman in prayers behind man does not indicate in any sense that she is inferior to him. Woman, as already mentioned, is exempt from attending congregational prayers which are obligatory on man. But if she does attend she stands in separate lines made up of women exclusively . This is a regulation of discipline in prayers, and not a classification of importance. In men’s rows the head of state stands shoulder to shoulder to the pauper. Men of the highest ranks in society stand in prayer side by side with other men of the lowest ranks. The order of lines in prayers is introduced to help every one to concentrate in his meditation. It is very important because Muslim prayers are not simply chanting or the sing-a-song type. They involve actions, motions, standing, bowing, prostration, etc. So if men mix with women in the same lines, it is possible that something disturbing or distracting may happen. The mind will become occupied by something alien to prayer and derailed from the clear path of mediation. The result will be a loss of the purpose of prayers, besides an offense of adultery committed by the eye, because the eye-by looking at forbidden things – can be guilty of adultery as much as the heart itself. Moreover, no Muslim man or woman is allowed during prayers to touch the body of another person of the opposite sex. If men and women stand side by side in prayer they cannot avoid touching each other. Furthermore, when a woman is praying in front of a man or beside him, it is very likely that any part of her dressed body may become uncovered after a certain motion of bowing or prostrating. The man’s eye may happen to be looking at the uncovered part, with the result that she will be embarrassed and he will be exposed to distraction or possibly evil thoughts. So, to avoid any embarrassment and distraction to help concentrate on mediation and pure thoughts, to maintain harmony and order among worshippers, to fulfill the true purposes of prayers, Islam has ordained the organization of rows, whereby men stand in front lines, and women behind the children.Anyone with some knowledge of the nature and purpose of Muslim prayerscan readily understand the wisdom of organizing the lines of worshippers in this manner.

The Muslim woman is always associated with an old tradition known as the “veil”. It is Islamic that the woman should beautify herself with the veil of honor, dignity, chastity, purity and integrity. She should refrain from all deeds and gestures that might stir the passions of people other than her legitimate husband or cause evil suspicion of her morality. She is warned not to display her charms or expose her physical attractions before strangers. The veil which she must put on is one that can save her soul from weakness, her mind from indulgence, her eyes from lustful looks, and her personality from demoralization. Islam is most concerned with the integrity of woman, with the safeguarding of her morals and morale and with the protection of her character and personality (cf. Qur’an, 24:30-31).

By now it is clear that the status of woman in Islam is unprecedentedly high and realistically suitable to her nature. Her rights and duties are equal to those of man but not necessarily or absolutely identical with them. If she is deprived of one thing in some aspect, she is fully compensated for it with more things in many other aspects. The fact that she belongs to the female sex has no bearing on her human status or independent personality, and it is no basis for justification of prejudice against her or injustice to her person. Islam gives her as much as is required of her. Her rights match beautifully with her duties. The balance between rights and duties is maintained, and no side overweighs the other. The whole status of woman is given clearly in the Qur’anic verse which may be translated as follows:

And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but man have a degree (of advantage as in some cases of inheritance) over them (2:228).

This degree is not a title of supremacy or an authorization of dominance over her. It is to correspond with the extra responsibilities of man and give him some compensation for his unlimited liabilities. The above mentioned verse is always interpreted in the light of another (4:34).

It is these extra responsibilities that give man a degree over woman in some economic aspects. It is not a higher degree in humanity or in character. Nor is it a dominance of one over the other or suppression of one by the other. It is a distribution of God’s abundance according to the needs of the nature of which God is the Maker. And He knows best what is good for woman and what is good for man. God is absolutely true when He declares:

O mankind! reverence your Guardian-Lord, Who created you from a single person, and created of like nature his mate,
and from them twain scattered (like seeds) countless men and women (4:1).

(Women Rights In Islam / Facebook / 20.05.2012)

#GazaCrisis | Lives of more than 400 kidney patients at risk in Gaza

GAZA, (PIC)– The Ministry of health in Gaza warned that the lives of 404 kidney patients are at risk because the stock of bloodlines, an essential dialysis machine consumable, is running very low.

In a statement on Friday, Ashraf al-Qudra, spokesman for the ministry, said that the lack of these lines will mean dozens of dialysis machines stopping work and will deny 404 kidney patients the essential treatment they need twice or three times a week to stay alive.

He added that the stock of bloodlines is running out fast because Gaza hospitals treat 150 kidney patients every day, each one of them needing one such line.

He called on the Red Cross, the World Health Organization, Human rights organizations, and the media to shoulder their responsibilities towards patients in the Gaza Strip and their right to receive essential treatment and to move quickly to save kidney patients there.

The warehouses of the Health Ministry ran out of 204 types of medication and 218 types of medical consumables. 200 others are on their way to depletion and will run out by June.

(occupiedpalestine.wordpress.com / 20.05.2012)

Settlers uproot trees in Beit Ummar, spray racist slogans

HEBRON (Ma’an) — Settlers attacked agricultural fields in Hebron-district village Beit Ummar late Saturday, a local official said.

Dozens of settlers stormed agricultural fields and uprooted olive and fruit trees, local committee against the wall official Muhammad Ayyad Awad said.

The land belongs to Hammad Abdul-Hamid Sleibi.

The settlers reportedly came from Bat Ayin settlement, north of Beit Ummar, and also sprayed racist slogans in the village.

“Death to Arabs” and “Kahane was right”, in reference to the founder of a far-right anti-Arab political party, were found on village property, Awad said.

(www.maannews.net / 20.05.2012)

Qatar International Islamic Bank souhaite créer une banque islamique au Maroc

Qatar International Islamic Bank QIIB - Maroc

  • QIIB souhaite créer une banque et une assurance islamique au Maroc

Le premier ministre marocain désigné, Abdelilah Benkirane, a reçu samedi 10 décembre 2011 Khalid bin Thani al-Thani, président de Qatar International Islamic Bank (QIIB) et vice président du patronat qatari, accompagné de Abdulbasit al-Shaibei PDG de QIIB.

Les entretiens ont porté sur la perspective d’établir une banque islamique et une assurance islamique au Maroc, ainsi que sur le renforcement de la coopération entre les deux pays notamment en matière d’investissements Qatari au Maroc.

La délégation qatarie a suggéré l’établissement d’un partenariat (joint venture) pour la création d’une banque islamique et d’une compagnie d’assurance dont le capital serait détenu à hauteur de 51% par des actionnaires marocains et de 49% par des fonds du Qatar. La banque projetée serait dédiée à l’activité de banque d’investissement Charia compatible.

Le président de Qatar International Islamic Bank a indiqué que l’ouverture de banques islamiques au Maroc répondrait à la demande croissante pour les services de finance islamique, de plus en plus de marocains exprimant leur préférence pour ce type de transactions.

Présentant les performances et les réalisation de QIIB, son président a souligné que la banque fournit des services financiers solides aux secteurs public et privé qataris et internationaux. Il a également décrit les diverses réalisations de Qatar International Islamic Bank, ainsi que les services bancaires et financiers fournis par les secteurs public et privé qataris au Qatar et dans le monde, ainsi que les solutions de financement innovantes proposés aux clients.

Souhaitant la bienvenue à la délégation, le premier ministre marocain a exprimé son souhait de renforcer les liens bilatéraux et souligné que la réussite de Qatar International Islamic Bank et de son business modèle pourraient être reproduits au Maroc. Benkirane a affirmé que « le Maroc souhaite bénéficier de l’expertise de QIIB dans le domaine de la finance islamique afin de dynamiser le secteur bancaire marocain et de répondre aux attentes des actionnaires et des clients ».

QIIB a confirmé dans un communiqué que le Maroc est attractif en matière d’investissement en raisons des opportunités et du climat d’affaires dans le pays, ainsi que de la proximité du pays des marchés européen et africain.

(ribh.wordpress.com / 12.12.11 / 20.05.2012)

Settlers Set Fire to Palestinian Agricultural Land in Hebron

HEBRON, May 20, 2012 (WAFA) – Jewish settlers Sunday set fire to Palestinian Agricultural land in an area near Khirbet Susiya, a locale south of Yatta in Hebron, according to a local activist.

Ratib al-Jabour, coordinator of the Popular Committee against the Wall and Settlements in southern Hebron, told WAFA that settlers from the Israeli settlement of Susiya, under Israeli soldiers protection, set fire to the harvested barley crops belonging to several Palestinians in the area.

He called upon all national, humanitarian, and international organizations to promptly intervene to put an end to these Israeli measures, which aim to force the residents to leave their land in order to seize it for settlement expansion.
(english.wafa.ps / 20.05.2012)
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 621 other followers