altahrir, news of Islam, Muslims, Arab Spring and special Palestine

A site of KhamakarPress ©

Archive for September 23rd, 2011

Abbas submits application to join UN

leave a comment »

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) — President Mahmoud Abbas asked the United Nations on Friday to recognize a state for his people, even though Israel still occupies its territory and the United States has vowed to veto the move.

UN spokesman Farhan Haq said Abbas handed Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon a letter requesting full UN membership, which the Security Council must consider — although this may take some time.

His appeal to the council reflects a loss of faith after 20 years of failed peace talks sponsored by the United States, Israel’s main ally, and alarm at relentless Israeli settlement expansion eating into the land Palestinians want for a state.

It also exposes Washington’s dwindling influence in a region shaken by Arab uprisings and shifting alliances that have pushed Israel, for all its military muscle, deeper into isolation.

“It is not a secret that the US administration has done everything it could to prevent us from going (to the United Nations),” Abbas, 76, told reporters late on Thursday.

“But we’re going without any hesitation and we will continue whatever the pressure … because we are asking for our right, because we want our independent state,” he added.

Abbas will set out his case in a speech to the UN General Assembly, where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will also take the podium to argue that only direct negotiations between the two sides can lead to a Palestinian state.

US President Barack Obama, who told the United Nations a year ago he hoped Palestinians would have a state by now, said on Wednesday he shared frustration at the lack of progress.

But he said only Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, not actions at the United Nations, could bring peace — despite a long history of fruitless peace talks.

Abbas is resorting to United Nations even though Israeli and US politicians have threatened financial reprisals that could cripple his Palestinian Authority, which rules the West Bank.

Should that happen, PLO official Saeb Erekat said, the PA could dissolve itself, throwing responsibility for ruling the whole area back to Israel as the occupying power.

“We will invite you to become the only authority from the River Jordan to the Mediterranean,” Erekat told Israel Radio.

In the West Bank, Palestinians expressed a mix of pride and wary anticipation ahead of their UN claim to statehood.

Flags and portraits of Abbas and his predecessor, the late Yasser Arafat, draped buildings in a central Ramallah square where Palestinians awaited a live broadcast of Abbas’ speech.

“This is something we should have done a long time ago,” said Khaled Shtayyeh, 42, carrying a Palestinian flag. “It was always stopped by international pressure. I am very proud.”

Burden of history

A gulf of mistrust separates Israelis and Palestinians, who each feel their existence is at stake in a bitter struggle over borders, security, refugees and Jerusalem.

Political rifts among Palestinians, and the constraints of US domestic politics, where support for Israel is strong, further complicate efforts to bridge the gaps.

The divisions are rooted in a heavy burden of history, painfully contested narratives and recurring bloodshed.

The United Nations partitioned Palestine in 1947, but Arab states rejected that and declared war on the new state of Israel, which then captured more territory than it had been allotted under the UN plan and dispossessed hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, who became refugees.

Two decades after Israel seized the West Bank, including east Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Middle East war, the Palestine Liberation Organization recognized Israel and reduced its demands to a state on those territories.

A 1993 agreement signed by PLO leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin set out a plan for Palestinian self-rule, which was never fully implemented.

Israel has continued to expand settlements in the West Bank, although it dismantled them in the Gaza Strip, now ruled by Hamas.

Palestinian uprisings erupted in 1987 and 2000, but failed to end Israeli occupation or bring statehood closer.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would continue to push for a durable, negotiated peace.

“Regardless of what happens tomorrow in the United Nations, we remain focused on the day after,” she said on Thursday.

Abbas, who has won new popularity at home for his UN plan, accepts that negotiations are still necessary, but argues statehood will put Palestinians on a more equal footing.

Israel sees the initiative at the United Nations as a sinister attempt to shear away its own legitimacy.

Hamas rejected Abbas’ statehood bid as unworthy.

“Our Palestinian people do not beg for a state,” said Ismail Haniyeh, who heads the Hamas administration in Gaza.

“States are not built upon UN resolutions. States liberate their land and establish their entities.”

Diplomats are trying to limit the fallout from the Palestinian statehood application.

The Security Council could delay action on Abbas’ request, giving the mediating “Quartet” — the United States, Russia, the European Union and the United Nations — more time to craft a declaration that could coax the two sides back to the table.

But the Quartet, whose envoys met again on Friday, has spent months trying to agree on a statement acceptable to the parties.

Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said the Quartet would await the speeches of Abbas and Netanyahu before setting out “some guidelines, key points and even some red lines.”

“It’s better to take one or two days more, rather than accelerating and having a weak statement,” he said.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has proposed that the General Assembly vote to upgrade the Palestinians to a “non-member state,” while reviving direct peace talks.

Israel rebuffed the idea. “A Palestinian state should be the outcome of negotiations, which means a Palestinian state should mark the end of conflict and cessation of claims,” Netanyahu’s cabinet secretary, Zvi Hauser, told Israel’s Army Radio.

(www.maannews.net / 23.09.2011)

Written by altahrir

September 23, 2011 at 4:30 pm

Waarom wil Palestina zo graag VN-erkenning?

leave a comment »

De Verenigde Staten en Israël moeten er niet aan denken: een Palestina dat erkend wordt door de Verenigde Naties. Maar ondanks alle druk zet de Palestijnse president Mahmoud Abbas toch door. Waarom wil hij dat zo graag?

//  

Daar zijn op zich genoeg redenen voor te bedenken. Een volwaardig VN-lidmaatschap zou Palestina letterlijk een stem geven bij elke beslissing die door de VN (en de daaraan gelieerde organisaties) wordt genomen. En vooral: elke lidstaat heeft het recht op hulp bij natuurrampen, en op steun als het wordt aangevallen.

Een dergelijke status lijkt dus wel een gokje waard. Maar Abbas weet dat Palestina het VN-lidmaatschap toch niet gaat krijgen. De Verenigde Staten kunnen tenslotte hun vetorecht gebruiken om de aanvraag te blokkeren.

Beren op de weg
De vraag waarom Abbas zoveel risico’s neemt, blijft dus staan. Want er liggen allerlei beren op de weg. Israël en de Verenigde Staten benadrukken dat het vredesproces op deze manier helemaal vastloopt. De VS zouden zelfs een streep kunnen trekken door de Amerikaanse financiëkle bijstand. Bovendien bestaat er een reeël gevaar dat de hoge verwachtingen van de Palestijnen straks alleen maar leiden tot teleurstelling, frustratie en mogelijk een nieuwe geweldsuitbarsting.

Abbas kan het zich echter niet veroorloven door de knieën te gaan voor druk van buitenaf. Dat is in het verleden al iets te vaak gebeurd, en de Palestijnen willen nu wel eens zien dat hun politieke leider aan de eigen wensen vast blijft houden.

Troostprijs
Bovendien is er nog een belangrijke troostprijs. De Palestijnse president kan aan de Algemene Vergadering vragen om de status van waarnemende staat. Daar is een tweederde meerheid voor nodig, en die krijgt hij waarschijnlijk wel bij elkaar.

Als ‘echte’ staat (nu is Palestina slechts een waarnemende entiteit) krijgen de Palestijnen mogelijk voet tussen de deur bij het Internationale Strafhof in Den Haag. Dat is precies wat Israël en de Verenigde Staten vrezen, want dit zou kunnen leiden tot een stroom van Palestijnse klachten – om te beginnen over de grootscheepse Israëlische acties op de Gazastrook in 2008, waarbij zeker 1300 mensen om het leven kwamen.

Grote overwinning
Bovendien zal de erkenning dat Palestina een staat is, zeker in het begin, als een grote overwinning voelen. Vooral ook, omdat Israël betoogt dat de Palestijnen geen echte natie zijn, en dus geen eigen land nodig hebben. Het zijn gewoon Arabieren, zo luidt de redenatie, die zich net zo makkelijk elders in de Arabische wereld kunnen vestigen.

Echte vrede in een veilige eigen staat is niet af te dwingen. Dat komt pas, als beide partijen elkaar genoeg vertrouwen om nader tot elkaar te kunnen komen. Maar het idee, het gevoel, dat het tijd is voor erkenning, en dat daar automatisch een soort gerechtigheid op volgt, is voor de Palestijnen te mooi om nu alweer afscheid van de te nemen.

(www.parool.nl / 23.09.2011)

Written by altahrir

September 23, 2011 at 4:22 pm

The Messenger by Tariq Ramadan

leave a comment »

The Messenger, The meanings of the life of Muhammad by Tariq Ramadan, who is also known as one of the most important innovators of 21ST century by Times magazine, deserves wide readership. The book has a different style of presenting events and interpreting the meanings of life of Muhammad (saw).

Though classical biographies give us a detailed account of historical facts, great achievements, or famous wars of the messenger but there is no profit in dealing with them exhaustively, this book focuses on narration of the story of his life, on situations , attitudes or words that could reveal Muhammad (saw)’s personality and what it can teach and convey us today. It approaches Muhammad (saw) life from the perspective of our own times considering how it still speaks to us and what its contemporary teachings are.

The book is strictly faithful to the classical biographies as far as chronology is concerned but constantly introduces reflections and comments of a spiritual ,Philosophical ,social , judicial ,political or cultural nature. It tries to make Messenger’s life a mirror through which readers facing the challenges of our times can explore their hearts and minds and achieves an understanding of questions of being and meaning as well as broader ethical and social concerns.
Muhammad (saw)’s relationship and dealings specially with non-Muslims, his trust and treaties with them, His overall approach towards diversity of human thoughts and beliefs is expressed many times in this book. It teaches us lessons and brings out many points which often are neglected or discarded but they play a very vital role in our understanding of how do we address the diversities and live in a plural society. It draws lessons which are crucial for Muslims and Non-Muslims alike.

No book can be last word on the Prophet (saw)’s life, and as time passes we will see many more exploration of this final Messenger. Readers will find a spiritual experience while going through this discourse, It is interspersed with spiritual & philosophical meditations and shows how Muhammad (saw) message can be used to address some of today’s most controversial issues ..from the treatment of the poor and the role of women to the interpretation of jihad and relations with other religions.

Mirza Kamran Baig

(sio-india.org / 23.09.2011)

Written by altahrir

September 23, 2011 at 4:03 pm

Posted in Opinion others

Tagged with ,

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 820 other followers